Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 2164   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 86-89

A comparison of sphygmomanometric and oscillometric methods of blood pressure measurements in adult in-patients


Department Of Anaesthesiology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, P.M.B. 1111, Benin City, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
F E Amadasun
Department Of Anaesthesiology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, P.M.B. 1111, Benin City, Nigeria

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 16477859

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

The study compared two non-invasive methods of blood pressure measurements used in the anaesthetic management of patients, the conventional sphygmomanometric and the oscillometric methods. One hundred adult in-patients were involved, and 400 blood pressure measurements were done with the two devices. The sphygmomanometric measurements were higher in systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure values. Correlation coefficient values between the two methods were r = 0.97, 0.81, 0.95 for systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures respectively, (p < 0.05). We conclude that there is a statistically significant difference in haemodynamic values determined by the two devices. This difference is however, not clinically significant to warrant a recommendation of adjustment when comparing values determined by the two devices.


[PDF Not available]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed365    
    Printed36    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal