Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 1807   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ARTICLE
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 105-108

Indications for removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices in Jos, north-central Nigeria


Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
J T Mutihir
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 17319339

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

CONTEXT: Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) are commonly used reversible methods of contraception. The CuT 380A is recommended for use for 10 years but common observation has shown that they are removed much earlier than the recommended duration ofuse. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study of all clients presenting at the family planning clinic of Jos University Teaching Hospital, between 1st January 1999 and 31st December 2004, for removal of their IUDs. MAJOR OUTCOMES/RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) age of the clients was 32.9 +/- 6.9 years and mean parity was 4.0 +/- 2.2. All the women were married. The CuT 380A IUD was used in 99.3% of the cases. The mean duration of IUD use was 51.5 +/- 51.0 months or 4.3 years only, and the commonest indication for removal was the desire for another pregnancy, which was recorded in 170 (30.7%) of the clients. This was followed by back pain in 70 (12.6%). Husbands' disapproval of the use of the device was recorded in 0.9% of the clients. CONCLUSION: The duration of IUD use by clients in our centre was very short. The commonest indication for removal of the device was to restore fertility. Shorter lasting IUDs may need to be revisited if these will cost less for clients wishing to use the method only to postpone pregnancies. More effective counselling may be appropriate for alternative contraceptive methods for this category of clients instead of the IUDs currently being used.


[PDF Not available]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed358    
    Printed48    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal