Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 3070   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 

  Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 400-402

The prevalence of Rhesus negativity among pregnant women in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria


1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu, Nigeria
2 Department of Haematology and Immunology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu, Nigeria

Date of Acceptance17-Dec-2011
Date of Web Publication12-Dec-2012

Correspondence Address:
T C Okeke
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.104511

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Hemolytic disease of the newborn, secondary to rhesus D (Rh D) iso-immunization, contributes significantly to perinatal morbidity and mortality. Prevalence data in Nigeria, and Southeast Nigeria in particular, is very scanty. This study was carried out to provide our experience in this preventable clinical condition in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria.
Objective:
To determine the prevalence and trends of Rh D negativity among pregnant women in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: A 5-year retrospective study of rhesus negative women was carried out at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria, between 1 st January 2000 and 31 st December 2004.
Result: The prevalence rate of Rh D negative women in Enugu, Nigeria, is 4.5%. Out of 6306 women who booked for antenatal care, 282 (4.5%) were Rh D negative women. One hundred and eighty-two (182) (64.5%) of the Rh D negative women were of blood group O followed by blood group A 20%, blood group B 12.1%, and blood group AB 3.2%, respectively.
Conclusion: There is a need for adequate counseling of pregnant women on the importance of Rh D negative factor during the antenatal period in order to prevent hemolytic disease of the newborn.

Keywords: Enugu, Southeast Nigeria, pregnancy, rhesus D iso-immunization


How to cite this article:
Okeke T C, Ocheni S, Nwagha U I, Ibegbulam O G. The prevalence of Rhesus negativity among pregnant women in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2012;15:400-2

How to cite this URL:
Okeke T C, Ocheni S, Nwagha U I, Ibegbulam O G. The prevalence of Rhesus negativity among pregnant women in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Nov 22];15:400-2. Available from: http://www.njcponline.com/text.asp?2012/15/4/400/104511


   Introduction Top


The rhesus (Rh D) group system is important in blood transfusion because the Rh D immune response in Rh D negative women is the primary etiology for hemolytic disease of the newborn. [1] The identification of the Rh D antigen and its description is a cornerstone of modern immune-hematology. [2]

Rh D iso-immunization, a disease of genetic predisposition, has been a focus of concern for obstetricians and hematologists for centuries. Now, there are options for both prevention and management of this historically difficult obstetrics. The frequency of Rh D iso-immunization in the general population continues to be a point of significance for the clinician, [3] as this significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality in obstetric practice. Allo-immunization to Rh D is a major factor in perinatal mortality and morbidity, and results in the compromise of the affected women's obstetric career. [2],[4] There is a need for further studies in Rh D (Rh D) negative pregnant women because several factors affect the development of allo-immunization and its prognosis. [4]

In Nigeria, large-scale studies on women to determine the incidence of Rh D negative women and the prevalence of allo-immunization are unavailable. The pioneer study done by Worlledge and colleagues [5] put the prevalence of Rh D negative status of the Nigerian population at 5% compared to 15% of Caucasians. In a recent work done by Kotila et al., at Ibadan, Nigeria, a prevalence of 5% was obtained among the pregnant women. [4]

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and trends of Rh D negativity among pregnant women in Enugu, Nigeria.


   Materials and Methods Top


A 5-year retrospective study of women who booked for antenatal care at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH) Enugu, Nigeria from 1 st January 2000 to 31 st December 2004 was carried out. This study was a single tertiary institution retrospective study at the UNTH Enugu. Data was obtained from the antenatal register of the blood bank unit of the Department of Hematology and Immunology. The ABO and Rh D factors are part of the routine investigations during the antenatal booking of women attending the antenatal clinics at the maternity complex of the Hospital. Antibody screenings are routinely performed at booking on Rh D negative women. Serial antibody titer levels are also performed at subsequent visits for those who are Rh D negative. The previous obstetric history, transfusion history, and obstetric findings were noted. Other information including age, religion, tribe, occupation, and social and family history on the booked Rh D negative pregnant women were obtained from their case files and the blood bank records. The Rh D blood group systems of the husbands of women booked for antenatal care is not routinely carried out in the UNTH Enugu unless this is specifically requested by the managing clinicians.

Ethical clearance: NHREC/05/01/200 B . Ethical review and clearance was obtained from the University of Nigeria Hospital Research and Ethics Committee. The study protocol was approved by the hospital review board. Department protocol was via informed written consent prior to data collection.


   Results Top


Six-thousand three-hundred and six (6306) women who booked for antenatal care at UNTH Enugu had their ABO and Rh D blood groups determined as part of their routine investigations at booking. Blood group O 3725 (59.1%) was the commonest blood group, followed by blood groups A 23.2%, B 15%, and AB 2.7%, respectively. The relative percentage of Rh D blood groups in [Table 1] shows that 6024 (95.5%) women were Rh D positive while 282 (4.5%) women were Rh D negative. During the period under study, 282 Rh D negative pregnant women were seen. One-hundred and eighty-two of the Rh D negative women (64.5%) were of blood group O followed by blood group A: 57 (20.2%), blood group B: 34 (12.1%), and blood group AB: 9 (3.2%), respectively. [Table 2] One-hundred and twenty (42.6%) of the husbands of the Rh D negative women had their Rh D blood groups recorded. One-hundred and fourteen (114) of these husbands were Rh D positive and six (6) were Rh D negative.
Table 1: Distribution of rhesus blood group

Click here to view
Table 2: Distribution of rhesus negative blood groups among pregnant women in Eastern Nigeria

Click here to view


Out of the 282 Rh D negative pregnant women, only 2 (0.7%) women had positive antibodies at the initial prenatal visit, 280 (99.3%) were negative, but 12 (4.3%) developed antibodies in the course of the pregnancy. These antibodies were developed from 24 weeks' gestational age. Ten of the babies born to Rh D negative women were severely affected by Rh D iso-immunization. Six of these babies had exchange blood transfusion, and four had satisfactory outcome and are still alive and well. Two babies were fresh stillbirth. Twenty-eight babies had neonatal jaundice with a mean bilirubin level of 6.2 mg/dL, which was mainly unconjugated. Twenty babies had a mean hematocrit of 54.2%. Ten babies had their Rh D groups recorded. Eight were Rh D positive while two were Rh D negative.

At the UNTH, Enugu, Nigeria, routine prophylaxis for Rh D negative pregnant women using Rhogam (Anti D) 500 IU is carried out within 72 h of delivery. Two-hundred and eighty (99.3%) Rh D negative women received Rhogam postpartum while 2 (0.7%) did not receive Rhogam because sensitization had already occurred.


   Discussion Top


The prevalence of Rh D negative women in Enugu, Nigeria, in this study is 4.5%. This is similar to previous studies done at Ibadan and Abraka in Nigeria. [4],[6] This rate shows a low frequency of Rh D negative Rh D blood group system in this environment. This finding is similar to that previously reported amongst African subjects, West Indians, and blacks in Great Britain. [7],[8] The results are, however, different from those reported from the Eastern highlands of Papua Guinea where the entire population was reported to be 100% Rh D positive. [9]

The Rh D negative blood system is of great clinical significance, especially in medical emergencies where appropriate group compatible blood may not be available. In pregnancy, Rh D negative women whose husbands are Rh D positive need adequate counseling on the etiology of Rh D iso-immunization during the antenatal period to prevent hemolytic disease of the newborn. [4],[7],[10] Rh D positive women were more commonly seen than Rh D negative women. No correlation was observed between ABO and Rh D blood groups. The distribution of Rh D blood group system among the women in Enugu, Nigeria, is similar to that seen among other Africans. [7],[8]

This study shows that Rh D iso-immunization is a rare cause of neonatal jaundice among neonates in Nigeria as previously documented. [7] The contribution of Rh D iso-immunization from this study to perinatal mortality at the UNTH Enugu is 0.7 per 1000 births.

Rhogam is given only as a prophylaxis and is useless once sensitization has occurred. One of the problems militating against effective prophylactic programs against Rh D iso-immunization is that it is very expensive (N 10,000-N 13, 000 ) (US $66.67-$86.67) and many women cannot afford to buy it. This is greatly affecting our prophylaxis programs in this hospital.

This study is limited by the fact that it is a pioneer study on Rh D negativity amongst pregnant women in Enugu with poor (inadequate) documentation of vital information; furthermore, being a retrospective study, unawareness and ignorance of the condition by the hospital staff and population at large.

There is need for proper public education about this preventable disease. Obstetricians, Hematologists, and Neonatologists also need to put in place a proper protocol for the management of Rh D negative pregnant women to prevent Rh D iso-immunization and to properly care for affected children.

 
   References Top

1.Levin P, Katzin EM, Bumham L. Isoimmunisation in pregnancy: Its possible bearing on the aetiology of erythroblastosis fetalis. JAMA 1941;116:825.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Ajayi GO. Rhesus red cell isoimmunization and ABO incompatibility. In: Agboola A, editor. Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for medical students. 2 nd ed, Ibadan: Heinemann Educational books (Nig) Plc; 2006. p. 381-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Shaughnessy RO, Kennedy M. Isoimmunization. In: Ling FW, Duff P, editors. Obstetrics and Gynaecology Principles for Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 308-26.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Kotila TR, Odukogbe AA, Okunola MA, Olayemi O, Obisesan KA. The pregnant Rhesus negative Nigerian women. Niger Postgrad Med J 2005;12:305-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Worlledge S, Luzzatto L, Ogiemudia SE, Luzzatto P, Edington GM. Rhesus immunization in Nigeria. Vox Sang 1968;14:202-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Onwukeme KE. Blood group distribution in blood donors in Nigeria population. Niger J Physiol Sci 1990;6:67-70.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Ezeilo GC. The influence of post-independence migrations on blood group distribution in Lusaka, Zambia. East Afr Med J 1970;47:686-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Odokuma EI, Okolo AC, Aloamaka PC. Distribution of ABO and rhesus blood groups in Abraka, Delta State. Niger J Physiol Sci 2007;22:89-91.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Salmon D, Godelier M, Halle L, Lemonnier P, Lory JL, Rouger P, et al. Blood groups in Papua New Guinea Eastern Highlands. Gene Geogr 1988;2:89-98.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Sembulingam K, Sembulingam P. Blood groups. In: Sembulingam K, Sembulingam P, editors. Essentials of medical physiology 4 th edition. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd; 2006. p. 118-23.  Back to cited text no. 10
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 RhD negativity among pregnant women in multiethnic Suriname
Rens Zonneveld,Peter Schmitz,Jedda Eppink,M. Sigrid Mac Donald,Lenny M.W. Nahar-van Venrooij,Humphrey H.H. Kanhai,Wilco C.W.R. Zijlmans
Transfusion. 2016; 56(2): 321
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Impact of Rhesus disease on the global problem of bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction
Alvin Zipursky,Vinod K. Bhutani
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2015; 20(1): 2
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7815    
    Printed95    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded810    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal