Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 562   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 387-394

Item analysis and evaluation in the examinations in the faculty of medicine at Ondokuz Mayis University


Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
L Tomak
Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: This research was supported by the Ondokuz Mayis University Scientific Research Project Coordination Unit (project no: PYO. This research was supported by the Ondokuz Mayis University Scientific Research Project Coordination Unit (project no: PYO. This research was supported by the Ondokuz Mayis University Scientific Research Project Coordination Unit (project no: PYO. TIP.1904.12.017)., Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.151720

Rights and Permissions

Background: Item analysis is an effective method in the evaluation of multiple-choice achievement tests. This study aimed to compare the classical and the latent class models used in item analysis, as well as their efficacy in the evaluation of the examinations of the medical faculty. Materials and Methods: The achievement tests in the medical faculty were evaluated using different methods. The two methods used were the classical and the latent class models. Among the classical methods, Cronbach's alpha, split half methods, item discrimination, and item difficulty was investigated. On the other hand, various models of item response theory (IRT) and their statistics were compared in the group of latent class methods. Results: Reliability statistics had values above 0.87. Item no. 7 was found easy, item no. 45 difficult and item no. 64 fairly difficult according to the evaluations done by classical and item response theories. In terms of item discrimination, item no. 45 had lower, item no. 7 had middle and item no. 64 had high discrimination levels. The distribution graph shows that personal abilities are good enough to tick the correct choice. Conclusion: In this study, similar results were obtained by classical and latent methods. IRT can be considered perfect at a mathematical level, and if its assumptions are satisfied, it can easily perform assessments and measurements for most types of complex problems. Classical theory is easy to understand and to apply, while IRT is, on the contrary, sometimes rather difficult to understand and to implement.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3404    
    Printed48    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded303    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal