Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 5792   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 616-619

Validity of the Demirjian method for dental age estimation for Southern Turkish children


1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey
2 Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Akdeniz, Antalya, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
A Y Gungor
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Akdeniz, Department of Orthodontics, Kampus, Antalya
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.154216

Rights and Permissions

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the Demirjian method for southern Turkish population. Materials and Methods: Panoramic radiographs of 535 patients (276 females, 259 males aged from 10 to 18 years) selected retrospectively. Dental age was calculated using the Demirjian's method. Chronologic age was calculated by subtracting the date of the birth from the date of the panoramic radiograph after having converted both to a decimal age. The chronologic and dental ages were compared using the paired t-test. Results: The mean difference between the chronologic and dental ages ranged from 0.02 to 0.79 years in females. These differences in females between the chronologic and dental ages were statistically significant in total (P < 0.050) and in G1 (10-10.90 years) (P < 0.010) and G2 (11-11.90 years) (P < 0.001). The mean difference between the chronologic and dental ages ranged from 0.04 to 0.85 years in males. These differences in males between the chronologic age and dental age were statistically significant in total (P < 0.010) and in G4 (13-13.90 years) G5 (14-14.90 years) G6 (15-15.90 years) groups (P < 0.050). Conclusions: It is appropriate to use the Demirjian method in southern Turkish children; however, a revision is needed in some age groups.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2053    
    Printed60    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded340    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal