Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 1349   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 

  Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 85-90

Testicular volume of healthy term neonates: Determination of normative values among Igbo babies in South-Eastern Nigeria


1 Department of Paediatrics, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria
2 Department of Paediatrics, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi, Nigeria

Date of Acceptance09-Jul-2015
Date of Web Publication12-Jan-2016

Correspondence Address:
M U Ibekwe
Department of Paediatrics, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Ebonyi
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.173704

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Testicular volume (TV) in neonates has some predictive values of clinical importance. Establishing the normal values of TV among term newborn males of every population is important as differences exist among different populations. Much is not known on TV among Igbo newborns.
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the normative values of TV in apparently healthy term Igbo newborn males in Enugu, South-Eastern Nigeria and its relationship with gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), and birth length (BL).
Subjects and Methods: This was a hospital-based, cross-sectional and descriptive study. Eight hundred and eleven apparently healthy term Igbo male neonates within the first 3 days of life were studied. The TV was measured with Prader Orchidometer (ZKL-135-H), ESP Model. Smoothed centiles (3–97th percentile values) for TV by GA were determined. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 (Chicago). P < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
Results: The mean TV was 1.74 ± 0.62 ml ranging from 1 to 3 ml. The TV increased with increasing GA (P = 0.00). Pearson's correlation test between TV and birth length (r = 0.301, P = 0.001), as well as with BW (r = 0.247, P = 0.001) were significant. A linear regression demonstrated correlation between TV and birth length (P = 0.0001, r2 = 0.091).
Conclusion: The mean TV among male Igbo newborn is 1.74 ± 0.62 ml. Also, the first smoothed percentile values for TV by GA for Nigerian Igbo babies is created.

Keywords: Gestational age, Igbo babies, smoothed percentile, testicular volume


How to cite this article:
Chikani U N, Ibekwe M U, Chinawa J M, Adimora G N. Testicular volume of healthy term neonates: Determination of normative values among Igbo babies in South-Eastern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2016;19:85-90

How to cite this URL:
Chikani U N, Ibekwe M U, Chinawa J M, Adimora G N. Testicular volume of healthy term neonates: Determination of normative values among Igbo babies in South-Eastern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Nov 18];19:85-90. Available from: http://www.njcponline.com/text.asp?2016/19/1/85/173704


   Introduction Top


The presence of the testes determining region of the Y-chromosomes is the key turning point in the gonadal differentiation into testes.[1] Testicular volume (TV) is largely a reflection of spermatogenesis with over 80% of the testicular mass consisting of seminiferous tubules while Leydig's cells make up the remaining 20%.[1],[2],[3],[4] Since testicular size is more closely related to spermatogenic activity than Leydig cell function, TV may reflect sperm production and male fertility in the future.[3] The volume of the testes at birth have some predictive values of clinical importance.[5] It has been observed that Danish men have a 4-fold higher incidence of testicular cancer and poor semen quality than the Finnish men do.[6] This was attributable to the smaller testicular size of Danish boys at birth and throughout infancy than the Finnish boys.[6] In addition, determination of the normal TV is necessary since the fetal testes secrete testosterone that is required for virilization of the male newborn and continued penile growth.[7] Defect of androgen production and genital development in the male are closely related to TV at birth.[1] Therefore, TV assessment at birth is important in early detection of disorders of sex development such as disorders of gonadal development and/or androgen synthesis.

There are different methods of measuring TV such as orchidometery, ultrasonography, water displacement, and use of calipers and rulers.[8] The Orchidometer is the most widely used and it has different types such as Prader, Tukihara-punched ring, Rochester and Seager.[9],[10] However, Prader orchidometer is the most popular, and it consists of a string of twelve numbered wooden or plastic beads of increasing size from about 1 to 25 ml in width. The beads are compared with the testicles, and the volume of the bead that matches most closely in size, is read off in ml.[10],[11],[12] Although Prader orchidometer is more practical, inexpensive, and less time-consuming, it tends to overestimate the TV, especially in small testes as it measures not only the testes but also the epididymis as well as the scrotal skin.[12],[13],[14],[15] Furthermore, the smallest bead in Prader orchidometer is 1 ml, making it impossible to get values <1 ml.[12],[13],[14]

On the other hand, ultrasonography is done by careful measurement of the testes in longitudinal and transverse planes to obtain the length, width, height, and the TV is then calculated using various formulae. These formulae include Lambert's formula 0.71 × L × W × H,[16] π/6 (LWH) × 0.52 and prolate formula (LW) 0.52.[16] Several studies that have compared orchidometery and ultrasonography [8],[9] concluded that ultrasound (US) measured volume is more precise showed low variability and correlated well with true TV, and thus, should be regarded as gold standard. However, the above studies [9],[16] still found a strong linear positive correlation (r2 = 0.96) between orchidometer and US measured volume, thus, the Prader orchidometer was used in this study.

The normal TV in neonates varies from 0.27 to 2.5 ml [8],[9],[12],[14],[15],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22] with an average of 1 ml.[17] These reference values were derived from previous studies.[11],[12],[14],[15],[18],[19],[21],[22] Chin et al.[18] in Taiwan, in 1998, measured the normal TV in 430 Taiwanese neonates using Prader orchidometer and reported the TV as 1.35 ± 0.3 ml. Similarly, Matsuo et al. in 2000[19] carried out a study in Japanese boys and recorded 1.2 ml as the TV in the neonatal period. Main et al.[6] measured the TV of Finnish and Danish newborn boys using ultrasonography and reported 0.98 ml and 0.95 ml, respectively. This is similar to Preiksa et al.[22] findings in 2009, in Lithuania, who reported an average of 0.9 ± 0.3 ml in 712 healthy newborn males. The above results suggest evidence of TV in some variations in the measurement of mean TV among the different population.

The Igbo people, are an ethnic group of South-Eastern Nigeria and constitute one of the largest ethnic groups in Africa.[23],[24] They have a unique cultural heritage and studies suggest a link between the influence of some environmental factors on TV. For instance, exposure to phthalates can interfere with the stage of proliferation of  Sertoli cells More Details in fetal and early postnatal life.[5] However, no consensus has been reached on the influence of race or ethnicity on infant TV.[13],[20],[21] Although several studies [13],[19],[20] have been done on TV among different countries worldwide, the emphasis was mainly on the different methods of measurements rather than differences based on racial or ethnic background. However, Kuijper et al.[13] in Amsterdam studied a multi-ethnic group of Caucasians, Asians, Mediterranean, and Africans living there, and found no difference between the various ethnic groups. On the other hand, Main et al.[6] reported a larger testis size in Finnish neonates compared to Danish boys. Although the phenomena could be due to the genetic difference between the two countries, it may also reflect an adverse environmental influence on testicular development.[6]

There is a dearth of data on TV in Nigerian baby boys. The reference values currently in use were done in Caucasians and may not be applicable to our clime. There is need to have a baseline data of TV of Igbo boys and how it compares with other published works These normative values aims to create baseline data that will serve as a guide to clinicians in appropriate assessment of TV among newborns in the Igbo population and Nigeria at large.


   Subjects and Methods Top


The study was hospital-based involving two Tertiary and one Secondary Hospitals in Enugu. Enugu is the capital city of Enugu State in South-Eastern, Nigeria located at 6° 27' 9.6” N, 7° 30' 37.2''.[23] It is largely populated by members of Igbo ethnic group. The city has a hilly geography with a population of 722,664.[23] It has a tropical savannah climate with a mean daily temperature of 26.7°C and average annual rainfall of 2000 mm.

These hospitals, included, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), and Mother of Christ Specialist Hospital (MCSH). These hospitals were purposively chosen because they enjoy very high patronage of patients, and combined average annual delivery is 1133.3 babies. All measurements were carried out in the labor wards and lying-in wards of these hospitals.

Study design

This was a cross-sectional and descriptive study, and subjects were enrolled consecutively within the first 72 h of life. Enrolled subjects were apparently healthy term male neonates with appropriate weight and whose parents are of Igbo extraction. A term baby is, one delivered from 37 completed weeks to 42 weeks of gestation. While, an apparently healthy baby with an appropriate weight is a baby who appears to be well with a normal weight, that is, between 2.5 and 3.99 kg.[1]

Neonates with ambiguous genitalia or suspected endocrine disorder were excluded from the study. Also, excluded from the study were babies with undescended testes and hydrocele, babies with dysmorphism or multiple congenital abnormalities, and neonates <2.5 kg and more than 4.0 kg. Neonates of nonconsenting mothers or babies from parents of non-Igbo extraction were also excluded from the study.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research and Ethics Committee of UNTH, ESUTH, and MCSH. Informed written consent was obtained from the parent/guardian of each subject after delivery. Details of the study were explained to the parents, and only those who gave consent were included in the study.

Data collection

Information obtained from the history and physical examinations were entered into a purpose-designed proforma. Subjects were consecutively enrolled from both the labor ward and lying-in ward. The mothers were interviewed to obtain bio data such as age, sex, and tribe of parents. Antenatal history and condition of each infant were obtained from the mothers and hospital records. A general examination was done for each neonate to determine the gender and other features of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Gestational age (GA) was calculated to the completed weeks and was determined from the maternal last menstrual period. The gestation of each neonate was also assessed using the new Ballard score.[25]

Measurements

All measurements were done by the researchers. To validate the accuracy and ensure the measurements, a pilot study was conducted, and 30 babies were measured. The interobserver and intraobserver differences were not statistically significant (kappa analysis was 0.96 and Cronbach's alpha = 0.97).

The birth length (BL) was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using an infantometer (Seca), model: 210182109. Birth weight (BW) of all subjects was weighed naked on a digital weighing scale (Seca, Vogel and Halke) sensitive to the nearest 10 g.

Measurement of testicular volume

TV was measured with a Prader orchidometer (ZKL-135-H), ESP Model. It has a sensitivity of <50%. The Prader orchidometer consists of 12 ellipsoid testis models graded from 1 to 25 ml (1–6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, and 25 ml) against which each testis was compared. The scrotal skin was stretched over the testis in a warm room, and the beads were compared by visual inspection with the testes. The volume of the bead that matches most closely was read off in ml. Both the right and left testes were measured. A testis size that was in - between two standard ellipsoid volumes was determined by calculating the mean between the larger and the smaller ellipsoid sizes.[5]

Data analysis

All the data obtained were recorded and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 17.0 (Chicago). Data were presented in prose, tables, figures, and graphs. The means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals of the continuous variables (TV, BW, and BL) were reported. The smoothed centiles (3–97th percentile values) for TV by GA were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and linear regression analyses were conducted to express the relationship between TV and GA and BW and BL. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.


   Results Top


The study lasted 6 months; from April to September 2012. Eight hundred and eleven neonates were studied. 146 neonates were from UNTH, 284 from MCSH, while 381 newborns were from ESUTH. The minimum GA was 37 weeks, while the maximum was 42 weeks with mean GA of 39.17 weeks ± 1.24. However, the majority of the subjects were delivered between 38 and 40 weeks of gestation [Table 1] and [Table 2].
Table 1: Characteristics of variables

Click here to view
Table 2: Distribution of BW (kg) of subjects

Click here to view


The minimum BW was 2.5 kg while the maximum was 4.0 kg with mean BW weight of 3.36 ± 0.42 kg. The majority of the patients weighed between 3.0 and 3.5 kg.

The majority of the subjects had a birth length between 49.1 and 51.0 cm, with a range of 45–55 cm and mean value of 51.12 cm. ±2.03 cm [Table]2,[Table 3],[Table 4].
Table 3: Distribution of body length (cm)

Click here to view
Table 4: The mean BW, BL, and TV at various GAs

Click here to view


The mean TV was 1.74 ± 0.62 ml with a range of 1–3 ml and the 95% confidence interval around the mean was 1.698–1.783 ml. There is significant statistical differences in the TV with the increasing GA (P = 0.00) see nomogram in [Table 5].
Table 5: Distribution of TV (ml) of subjects

Click here to view


The smoothed percentiles for TV by GA were calculated and shown in [Table 6]. There was no observed difference in TV for each GA below the 10th percentile. The 50th percentile corresponded to the median value of TV for each GA. Their corresponding values at 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42 weeks were 1.48 ml, 1.59 ml, 1.70 ml, 1.81 ml, 1.92 ml, and 2.03 ml, respectively [Table 6].
Table 6: Percentiles for TV (ml) by GA (weeks)

Click here to view


Pearson's correlation test showed a statistically significant correlation between TV and birth length (r = 0.301, P = 0.001) as well as in body weight (r = 0.247, P = 0.001) [Table 7].
Table 7: Pearson's correlation between TV with growth parameters of BW and birth length

Click here to view


Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the TV and birth length (P = 0.0001, r2 = 0.091) [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Linear regression showing the correlation between testicular volume and birth length

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Adequate spermatogenesis is presumed to be possible only in a testis of normal or nearly normal volume.[25] Although TV measurements are considered important for assessing spermatogenesis, a cut-off value for the TV that would ordinarily ensure normal testicular function has not been established.

The mean TV (1.74 ml) in this study was similar to the TV (1.73 ml) documented by Semiz et al.[26] in Turkey but slightly higher than the findings of Chin et al.[18] in Taiwan (1.35 ml), as well as Matsuo et al.[19] in Japan (1.2 ml) and Béres et al.[20] in Hungary. However, it was relatively lower than the TV of 2.4 ml reported by Ting and Wu [27] in Malaysia. There are appreciable differences in the values of TV reported by the aforementioned studies though they all used Prader orchidometer for measurement but for Béres et al. who used Hymie's testometer. The differences can be explained by the lack of precision and low sensitivity associated with Prader orchidometer. On the other hand, TV reported in this study was much higher than the values of US measured TV, reported in some studies.[13],[21] The observed significant differences could be explained by the lack of standardization in the methodologies. However, racial and ethnic influence cannot be ruled out entirely.

Furthermore, the true TV is only slightly overestimated by US when compared to orchidometer.[28] It is unknown whether the reliability of the Prader orchidometer is age dependent.[3] It is also noted that the orchidometer measures the epididymis as well as the scrotal skin, and, as a result, it tends to slightly overestimate TV, especially in small testes, in which the epididymis is large in comparison to the total TV. Notwithstanding, because of its practical use, the Prader orchidometer is one of the main instruments in the analysis of TV. However, because of its accuracy in the follow-up of testicular growth, US has an additional role in the development of puberty.[13]

It is important to note that few studies comparing the orchidometer and US found that both methods correlated well.[2],[12],[21],[29]

We also noted a statistically significant positive correlation between TV and GA.

This positive correlation between TV and GA is also noted by Malas et al.[30] He noted that this increase in TV and GA is traceable to the fact that laminar propia (fibroblast-like and myoid-like type) in the testis and the interstitial tissue become more mature and regular and had a well-organized structure with progress of GA. He also opined that in the third trimester, the lumen in the seminiferous tubules and the testes became more regular and clear, and the interstitial tissue had a clear appearance.[30]

From the above findings, it becomes meaningful to evaluate and calculate the individual expected values for TV of term newborns that this sample represents. However, the nature of these correlations on a much more comprehensive scale can only be understood via the contribution of future studies by various centers around the world on TV of newborn males.

This increase of TV and GA was also buttressed by Cicognani et al.[31] He noted that small age subjects have pituitary-gonadal axis function that tends toward hypogonadism. Disruption of the exocrine function in babies with smaller testicular size is a possible reason for this.

We also noted increase in TV with BW in this study. This was also corroborated by Semiz et al.[26] Hormonal changes and maturity of the pituitary hypothalamic axis as GA progresses, could explain these changes.[26]

We noted, in this study, a positive correlation between birth length and TV. Also, a linear regression between TV and body length showed a statistically significant correlation (P = 0.0001 r2 = 0.091), implying that 0.9% of variations are explained by a body length. However, this was refuted by Sutan-Assin et al. who noted no correlation. The difference between our finding and that of Sutan-Assin could be due to the smaller sample size used. Racial and geographical differences could also be contributory.[32]


   Conclusion Top


The mean TV of Igbo babies was 1.74 ± 0.62 ml with the first set of smoothed percentiles generated and our findings indicate some variations from studies from other populations. This study has also shown a positive correlation between TV and GA and BW and birth length.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Stoll BJ, Kliegman RM. The newborn infant. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman MD, Hal BJ, editors. Nelson Text Book of Pediatrics. 17th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier; 2004. p. 523-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Takihara H, Cosentino MJ, Sakatoku J, Cockett AT. Significance of testicular size measurement in andrology: II. Correlation of testicular size with testicular function. J Urol 1987;137:416-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Lenz S, Giwercman A, Elsborg A, Cohr KH, Jelnes JE, Carlsen E, et al. Ultrasonic testicular texture and size in 444 men from the general population: Correlation to semen quality. Eur Urol 1993;24:231-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Arai T, Kitahara S, Horiuchi S, Sumi S, Yoshida K. Relationship of testicular volume to semen profiles and serum hormone concentrations in infertile Japanese males. Int J Fertil Womens Med 1998;43:40-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sharpe RM. Perinatal determinants of adult testis size and function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:2503-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Main KM, Toppari J, Suomi AM, Kaleva M, Chellakooty M, Schmidt IM, et al. Larger testes and higher inhibin B levels in Finnish than in Danish newborn boys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:2732-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Low LC, Wang C. Disorders of sexual development in the Paediatric and adolescent male. In: Lavin N, editor. Manual of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 4th ed. New Delhi: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009. p. 276-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Al Salim A, Murchison PJ, Rana A, Elton RA, Hargreave TB. Evaluation of testicular volume by three orchidometers compared with ultrasonographic measurements. Br J Urol 1995;76:632-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Paltiel HJ, Diamond DA, Di Canzio J, Zurakowski D, Borer JG, Atala A. Testicular volume: Comparison of orchidometer and US measurements in dogs. Radiology 2002;222:114-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Behre HM, Nashan D, Nieschlag E. Objective measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography: Evaluation of the technique and comparison with orchidometer estimates. Int J Androl 1989;12:395-403.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Chipkevitch E, Nishimura RT, Tu DG, Galea-Rojas M. Clinical measurement of testicular volume in adolescents: Comparison of the reliability of 5 methods. J Urol 1996;156:2050-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Taskinen S, Taavitsainen M, Wikström S. Measurement of testicular volume: Comparison of 3 different methods. J Urol 1996;155:930-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kuijper EA, van Kooten J, Verbeke JI, van Rooijen M, Lambalk CB. Ultrasonographically measured testicular volumes in 0- to 6-year-old boys. Hum Reprod 2008;23:792-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Fuse H, Takahara M, Ishii H, Sumiya H, Shimazaki J. Measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography. Int J Androl 1990;13:267-72.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Rivkees SA, Hall DA, Boepple PA, Crawford JD. Accuracy and reproducibility of clinical measures of testicular volume. J Pediatr 1987;110:914-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Hsieh ML, Huang ST, Huang HC, Chen Y, Hsu YC. The reliability of ultrasonographic measurements for testicular volume assessment: Comparison of three common formulas with true testicular volume. Asian J Androl 2009;11:261-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Cassorla FG, Golden SM, Johnsonbaugh RE, Heroman WM, Loriaux DL, Sherins RJ. Testicular volume during early infancy. J Pediatr 1981;99:742-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Chin T, Liu C, Wei C. Testicular volume in Taiwanese boys. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1998;61:29-33.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Matsuo N, Anzo M, Sato S, Ogata T, Kamimaki T. Testicular volume in Japanese boys up to the age of 15 years. Eur J Pediatr 2000;159:843-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Béres J, Papp G, Pazonyi I, Czeizel E. Testicular volume variations from 0 to 28 years of age. Int Urol Nephrol 1989;21:159-67.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Goede J, Hack WW, Sijstermans K, van der Voort-Doedens LM, Van der Ploeg T, Meij-de Vries A, et al. Normative values for testicular volume measured by ultrasonography in a normal population from infancy to adolescence. Horm Res Paediatr 2011;76:56-64.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Preiksa RT, Zilatiene B, Matulevicus V. Penile size and testicular volume in healthy Lithuanian newborns. ECE 2009;20:637-40.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
National Population Commission of Nigeria. Provisional census figures. Official gazette 2007;24:185-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Otite O. Ethic pluralism and ethnicity in Nigeria. Niger J Democracy 1990;2:35-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr 1991;119:417-23.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Semiz S, Küçüktasçi K, Zencir M, Sevinç O. One-year follow-up of penis and testis sizes of healthy Turkish male newborns. Turk J Pediatr 2011;53:661-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Ting TH, Wu LL. Penile length of term newborn infants in multiracial Malaysia. Singapore Med J 2009;50:817-21.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Kollin C, Hesser U, Ritzén EM, Karpe B. Testicular growth from birth to two years of age, and the effect of orchidopexy at age nine months: A randomized, controlled study. Acta Paediatr 2006;95:318-24.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Ndu IK, Ibeziako SN, Obidike EO, Adimora GN, Edelu BO, Chinawa JM, et al. Chest and occipito-frontal circumference measurements in the detection of low birth weight among Nigerian newborns of Igbo ethnicity. Ital J Pediatr 2014;40:81.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Malas MA, Sulak O, Oztürk A. The growth of the testes during the fetal period. BJU Int 1999;84:689-92.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Cicognani A, Alessandroni R, Pasini A, Pirazzoli P, Cassio A, Barbieri E, et al. Low birth weight for gestational age and subsequent male gonadal function. J Pediatr 2002;141:376-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Sutan-Assin M, Rukman J, Dahlan A. Penile dimensions of newborn infants. Paediatr Indones 1989;29:146-50.  Back to cited text no. 32
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1737    
    Printed51    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded175    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal