Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 4678   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 811-815

Challenges and outcome of cranial neuroendoscopic surgery in a resource constrained developing African country

1 Department of Surgery, Neurological Surgery Unit, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria
2 Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra, Nigeria
3 Department of Anaesthesia, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria
4 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
Dr. E O Uche
Department of Surgery, Neurological Surgery Unit, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu, 40001
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.183236

Rights and Permissions

Background: Cranial neuroendoscopy has been safely applied to the surgical treatment of different lesions of the brain in our center since its introduction in September 2009. This article summarizes our experience with neuroendoscopy, highlighting the salient challenges and outcome. Methods: A single institution, retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired cases over a 2.5-year period (September 2010 to February 2013). Challenges experienced during the course of patient care as well as complications and outcomes were recorded and analyzed using SPSS (SPSS Inc. Chicago IL, USA) version 17. Tests of statistical significance were set at 95% level. Results: Of the 291 cranial procedures performed during the study period, 37 (12.7%) were neuroendoscopic interventions. Patients were between the ages of 0.25 years and 25 years with a mean of 5.7 ± 1.5 years (95% confidence interval (CI)). Aqueductal stenosis was the most common indication for endoscopic intervention in 22 (59.5%) patients. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy was the most commonly performed neuroendoscopic procedure in 21 patients (56.7%). Major challenges experienced were patient dependent in 28 ± 1.0 patients (95% CL), learning curve related in 21 ± 0.4 patients, and poor endoscopy support infrastructure in 15 ± 0.5 patients. Complications were significantly more common in the first 6 months of neuroendoscopy (χ2= 7.57, df = 1, P< 0.05). Overall, 30 (81.1%) patients in our study experienced a positive outcome. The permanent morbidity and mortality rates in our series were 2.7% and 8.5%, respectively. Conclusion: Highlighted are the myriad obstacles which interface the successful set up of neuroendoscopy service especially in resource-constrained settings. Endoscopic procedures become safer with experience and complications reduce significantly after a steep learning curve.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded179    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal