Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 6302   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 10  |  Page : 1322-1327

Intrathecal ropivacaine in cesarean delivery


1 Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Uskudar, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. R Y Ateser
Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital Anesthesiology and Reanimation Uskudar, Istanbul
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.219520

Rights and Permissions

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the optimum dose of ropivacaine by comparing three different dosing regimens of isobaric ropivacaine 1% (naropin 10 mg/ml, Astra Zeneca) administered intrathecally and to demonstrate the effects of anesthesia in pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section. Patients and Methods: Sixty ASA grade I-II patients were scheduled to undergo elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned into three groups. Group 1 received 15 mg ropivacaine 1%, Group 2 received 20 mg ropivacaine 1%, and Group 3 received 25 mg ropivacaine 1%. Results: Intraoperative hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between the three groups, and sensory block time, motor block time and time to reach maximal sensory block time, and motor block time were similar between the three groups. The time to two-segment regression of sensory block was longer in Group 3 compared to other groups, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The motor block time was longer with higher doses of ropivacaine; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Ropivacaine administration produced rapid induction of anesthesia and satisfactory anesthesia level, ropivacaine 15 mg and 20 mg dosing regimens are satisfactory for spinal anesthesia.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1806    
    Printed40    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded341    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal