Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 7288   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 12  |  Page : 1557-1563

Treatment of class II malocclussion: A comparative study of the effects of twin-block and fatigue resistant device


Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. M Goymen
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep 27310
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_110_18

Rights and Permissions

Aim: This is a retrospective cephalometric study aimed to compare the treatment effects of Twin-Block (TB) appliance with The Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FRD) appliance in class II division I patients in a composite of peak and post peak growth of period time. Materials and Methods: The experimental sample consisted of the lateral cephalograms of 40 patients who were treated with either TB appliance (n = 15), FRD (n = 15) or the untreated control ones. In treatment groups lateral cephalograms taken before therapy as initial records (T1) and at the completion of functional therapy (T2) were used. The control group comprised 10 children with untreated skeletal Class II malocclusions. The normality of distribution of continuous variables was tested by Shaphiro wilk test. Oneway ANOVA and LSD test in parametric; Kruskall Wallis and all pairwaise multible comparison tests in non-parametric samples were used for comparing differences among 3 groups. Results: Cephalometric analysis revealed that both TB and FRD appliances stimulated mandibular growth (P < 0.05) and no restriction was seen in maxilla in both groups (P > 0.05). The unwanted mandibular proclination was seen more in FRD group (P ≤ 0.001). Soft tissue didn't imitate the hard tissue (P > 0.05). Conclusion: FRD group produced skeletal effects as much as TB group in peak and post peak period of growth with still more mandibular incisor proclination.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed939    
    Printed46    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded313    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal