Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 2241   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 1158-1163

Impact of oral clefts on the oral health-related quality of life of preschool children and their parents

1 Department of Dental Public Health, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Department of Orthodontics, Orthodontic Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3 Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Correspondence Address:
Dr. A Golkari
School of Dentistry, Ghasrdasht Street, Shiraz, Postal Code: 71956-15878
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_426_17

Rights and Permissions

Objective: To assess the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of preschool children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and their relatives. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 55 2–5-year-old children with the history of CLP were randomly selected from those referred to Shiraz Lip and Palate Cleft Research Center and treated with single-stage closure (Push back palatoplasty). Furthermore, same number of children with the same age who attended the Shiraz School of Dentistry for routine dental care were selected as control group using randomized sampling. Children's demographic data were obtained from their parents. Farsi version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (F-ECOHIS) was used for evaluating these children's QoL. Results: We found a significant difference in OHRQoL between children with CLP and children without CLP in the overall score of F-ECOHIS and all of subscales. In the impact on children subscale, the difference between these groups was remarkable in limitations' domain. As for difficulties faced by children, question on “difficulty in pronouncing words” had the highest average score. Furthermore, in impact on family, in parental distress domain, the difference between these groups was remarkable. For difficulties faced by family, financial impact got the highest average score. No significant difference was found between boys and girls with CLP in all subscales. While according to the score of total F-ECOHIS in unilateral and bilateral CLP children, there was statistically significant difference in these groups. Conclusion: Since oral clefts affect the QoL of children and their families even after the usual treatments, the implementation and maintenance of multidisciplinary interventional strategies are required for establishment of facial esthetics, oral function, and psychological support for such individuals.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded314    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal