Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 1556   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 1198-1202

Is stent type used in snodgrass method a factor in fistula formation?


Department of Pediatric Surgery, Firat University School of Medicine, Elazig, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. M Sarac
Departments of Pediatric Surgery, Firat University School of Medicine, 23119, Elazig
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_317_17

Rights and Permissions

Context: Snodgrass method (tubularized incised plate urethroplasty [TIPU]) is a widely used technique for hypospadias repair. Aim: It was aimed to compare the outcome of hypospadias repair with stenting using feeding tube compare with those with Foley catheter. Subjects and Methods: The demographic characteristics of the 123 patients who underwent hypospadias repair with Snodgrass method, the success of the applied method, and the factors affecting fistula complication were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: those operated before January 2010 (Group A) and those who were operated after (Group B). In Group A patients, urethroplasty was performed using silicone Foley catheters, in which balloon of these catheters was filled by saline at appropriate size. In Group B, urethroplasty was performed using feeding catheter. Results: Group A and Group B consisted of 32 and 91 patients, respectively. Fistula developed in 10 (31.3%) and 4 (4.39%) patients in Group A and Group B, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the development of fistula complication (P = 0.0002). Conclusion: The use of a feeding catheter in TIPU could be a more advantageous than using a Foley catheter.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed889    
    Printed38    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded135    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal