Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 498   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 1228-1233

Is sino-nasal outcome test-22 reliable for guiding chronic rhinosinusitis patients for endoscopic sinus surgery?

Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. A Singh
2213, Sector 38 C, Chandigarh
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_429_17

Rights and Permissions

Chronic rhino-sinusitis (CRS) is a significant health problem whose incidence and prevalence is rising. An emphasis has been placed on diseasespecific quality of life (QoL as the predominant measure for most current outcome studies. Therefore a validated measure of health-related QoL in sinonasal disease is needed. The present prospective and observational study was conducted on 50 patients in the Department of ENT at Govt. Medical College and Rajindra Hospital Patiala, Punjab, India. The primary outcomes were the following: (1) the chance of attaining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) improvements of nine points at the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for different preoperative QoL levels, and (2) the percentage of relative improvement in SNOT-22 after ESS for different preoperative QoL levels. Methods: Patients with CRS who were elected for ESS were prospectively enrolled into an observational cohort study. They were categorized into 10 preoperative SNOT-22 groups based on 10-point increments beginning with a score of 10 and ending at 110. Standard protocol for all patients presenting for evaluation included completion of the SNOT-22 prior to and following surgical intervention. The scores were calculated and the data collected were compiled and analyzed. Results: A total of 50 patients were included in this study. Patients with a SNOT-22 score between 10 and 19 had the lowest chance of achieving an MCID. Patients with a SNOT-22 score greater than 30 had a greater than 90% chance of achieving an MCID, and there was a relative improvement of 43.3% on their preoperative SNOT-22 scores. CRS patients with polyp had better outcomes (47.1% improvement) after ESS than those without polyp (33.2% improvement). Conclusion: There is an increased probability of achieving an MCID at SNOT-22 score >30 and in general the percentage of relative improvement increased with an increase in preoperative SNOT score.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded255    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal