Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 939   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 79-83

Apical extrusion of debris after canal shaping with three single-file systems


1 Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Periodontics, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Georgia, USA
2 Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University; Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt
3 Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University; Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Dr. M M Elashiry
Department of Periodontics, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1120 15th Street, CB 2717, Augusta, GA. 30912

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_319_19

Rights and Permissions

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quantity of apically extruded debris after canal shaping with three single-file systems. Materials and Methods: Sixty mesiobuccal canals of mandibular molars were divided into three experimental groups according to the used file systems—WaveOne Gold, RECIPROC Blue, and HyFlex EDM One file. Debris extruded during canal shaping were collected in preweighed vials. Each canal was irrigated with 5 mL of distilled water via a 30 G side-vented needle. The amount of the debris extruded from each canal was calculated by subtracting the preinstrumentation from postinstrumentation measurement. The preparation times were recorded. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and posthoc Tukey tests with α = 0.05. Results: WaveOne Gold extruded the least amount of debris. Results between WaveOne Gold and HyFlex EDM were significantly different. No significant differences in canal shaping time were detected among the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: WaveOne Gold showed the best results regarding apical debris extrusion. Difference between WaveOne Gold and HyFlex EDM suggests that file design and motion kinematics affect the quantity of debris extrusion.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed599    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded158    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal