|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 476-480
Evaluation of the possible relationship between obesity and temporomandibular joint disorders
S Gunen Yilmaz1, H Tercanli Alkis1, 2
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, 07058, Antalya, Turkey
|Date of Submission||10-Sep-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||20-Dec-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||4-Apr-2020|
Dr. H Tercanli Alkis
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, 07058, Antalya
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Objectives: The objective of this study is to question the existence of a possible relationship between obesity and temporomandibular joint disorders. Subjects and Methods: A total of 256 healthy subjects were included in the study. While the body mass index was used for the detection of obesity, Fonseca anamnestic index was used for the detection of temporomandibular joint disorders. The relationship between body mass index and temporomandibular joint disorders frequency was investigated. Values of P< 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: There were 136 female (53.1%) and 120 male (46.9%) subjects. The mean age was 39.02 ± 10.62. 41.4% of the subjects were in normal weight, 32.4% were overweight and 26.1% were obese. The prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders was 73.8%.
Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between body mass index and temporomandibular joint disorders frequency, but further larger studies will give more accurate outcomes.
Keywords: Body mass index, obesity, temporomandibular joint disorders
|How to cite this article:|
Yilmaz S G, Alkis H T. Evaluation of the possible relationship between obesity and temporomandibular joint disorders. Niger J Clin Pract 2020;23:476-80
|How to cite this URL:|
Yilmaz S G, Alkis H T. Evaluation of the possible relationship between obesity and temporomandibular joint disorders. Niger J Clin Pract [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 28];23:476-80. Available from: http://www.njcponline.com/text.asp?2020/23/4/476/281922
| Introduction|| |
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) carries out activities such as opening and closing the mouth, speaking, swallowing, chewing, and stretching during the day. The frequency of temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJD) is reported as 5–50% in various studies in the general population,,,, and is seen more frequently in females than in males. TMJDs are more common in the age group of 20–40 years.,
Organic and nonorganic factors (emotional stress, sleep, etc.) are influential in etiology., Organic pathologies may arise from intra-articular tissues, periarticular muscles and ligaments, and systemic inflammatory diseases that affect TMJ. Symptoms in TMJD are often a pain in TMJ and chewing muscles, limitation in right and left anteroposterior movements of the jaw, mouth opening, and clicking in the joint.,,,,
Obesity and overweight are one of the serious health problems of our age and affect individuals from almost every age group. There are many methods to measure obesity. One of the easiest ways to measure obesity is to calculate body mass index (BMI).
Obesity is known as a risk factor for many health problems., The fact that obesity is a risk factor for TMJD is associated with an increased inflammatory mechanism triggered by obesity, changes in eating patterns, and joint problems it causes.,,,
A number of forms have been set up to detect TMJD and attempts have been made to determine the frequency in different populations. The questionnaire developed by Fonseca et al. is frequently used to determine TMJD.
It is known that the factors related to habits are effective in the causes of obesity and various types of pain. In light of this information, the aim of this study is to question the existence of a possible relationship between obesity and TMJD.
| Material and Methods|| |
This study was designed as a cross-sectional clinical research. Ethics approval (70904504/36) was obtained from the Presidency of Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Akdeniz University and the study follows the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. A study group was created from patients who applied to Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry for a routine dental examination or various treatments. A total of 256 healthy subjects were included in the study. All participants were between 19-67 years of age. In this study, individuals without the following conditions were included: (I) presence of systemic diseases, bone mineral diseases, malignant diseases, psychiatric disorder, congenital anomalies, mental retardation, (II) presence of a history of trauma in the ora-facial region, (III) presence of parafunctional habits such as bruxism, tooth grind, nail-finger eating, (IV) presence of TMJ dysfunction, (V) presence of history of orthodontic treatment, (VI) presence of a malocclusion, (VII) pregnancy, and (VIII) smoking.
Calculation of the BMI
The BMI of all patients in the study population was calculated using the formula as follows:
BMI = kg/m2 where kg is a person's weight in kilograms and m2 is their height in meters squared.
18.5–24.9 is accepted as normal weight, 25–29.9 is accepted as overweight, 30–39.9 is accepted as obesity and, >40 is accepted as morbid obesity.
Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI)
Demographic data of patients were obtained by scanning electronic patient files. The Fonseca et al. Questionnaire, which is widely used, was used to assess the severity and frequency of TMJD [Table 1]. Participants in the study responded to the questions on the questionnaire on a voluntary basis without any time limit.
The questionnaire consists of 10 questions, and the answers to the questions are evaluated as “yes, sometimes, no.” In these 10 questions, the following were assessed: mouth opening, the right-left movement of the jaw, pain in the jaw muscles, joint and ear pain, head and neck pain, joint click noise, malocclusion, and emotional stress during chewing [Table 1]. The questionnaire was rated as yes: 10 points, sometimes: 5 points, no: 0 points, and the total score showed the severity of TMJD.
TMJD severity was classified as; without dysfunction (score between 0 and 15), mild dysfunction (score between 20 and 40), medium dysfunction (score between 45 and 65), and severe dysfunction (score between 70 and 100).
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The test of normality was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov correlation analysis. The differences of the TMJD scores and BMI scores according to genders were tested with the Chi-square test. The relationship between BMI and TMJD was evaluated through logistic regression analysis and correlation (Pearson's r coefficient), as well as Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
All the individuals included in the study were 256. There were 136 females (53.1%) and 120 males (46.9%). The distribution of the participants was statistically insignificant in terms of gender (P = 0.093). The mean age was 39.02 ± 10.62. There was no significant relationship between TMJD and age.
41.4% of the subjects were in normal weight, 32.4% were overweight, and 26.1% were people with obesity. The distribution of BMI according to genders is shown in [Table 2]. The number of females with obesity was higher than males; the number of overweight males was higher than females, but there was no statistically significant difference between the genders (P = 0.059).
The prevalence of TMJD in this study was 73.8% in the whole group. 131 individuals had mild, 45 had moderate, 13 had severe TMJD, and 67 had no TMJD [Table 3].
According to the data obtained from the Fonseca survey, the TMJD status of the study group was given in [Table 4] (P = 0.070). Half of both females and males had mild-grade joint problems. While the rate of males without TMJD was 31.7%, the rate of females was 21.3%; between the genders, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of the prevalence of TMJD (P = 0.059).
|Table 4: Distribution of TMJDs status (with Fonseca anamnestic index) according to genders|
Click here to view
The presence and levels of TMJD for varying BMI ranges are given in [Table 5]. The rate of without TMJD was 46.3% in normal weight and this ratio decreased to 17.9% in subjects with overweight and obesity. Similarly, the rate of the mild stage, moderate, and severe TMJD increased with weight gain compared to normal subjects. When BMI groups were examined, TMJD prevalence was higher in normal and increasing weight, but according to these data, there was no statistically significant difference between BMI ranges in terms of TMJD presence and levels (P = 0.076).
| Discussion|| |
The prevalence of TMJD seen in the literature is 5–50%. LeResche et al. showed that TMJD prevalence was seen in more than 10% of the population in their study, and Akhter et al. found that this rate was around 30% in their Japanese university students. In the study by Badel et al., the incidence of TMJD was 79.82% in young adults and 87.10% in older adults. In the current study, this rate was higher than other studies and the prevalence of TMJD was 73.2%. These differences may be due to the number of patients in the studies and inclusion/exclusion criteria. It is known that the frequency of factors such as abrasion, anxiety, myofascial pain in the teeth that are thought to cause TMJD with age increases while bruxism and mixed dentition period are effective in children and adolescents.
In the literature, the increased prevalence of TMJD due to changing mental stress in women has previously been demonstrated. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of males and females in our study. Similar to the current study, Wright et al. did not find a significant difference between the genders in their study, while in most of the previous studies, the prevalence of TMJD was higher in females than males.,,,
In the current study, the relationship between obesity and TMJD was not found to have any statistical significance, and the prevalence of TMJD did not change with age. Wright et al. did not find the age factor statistically significant as similar to the current study. However, Rhim et al. showed that the age variable in both males and females poses a risk for TMJD.
There are several studies evaluating the relationship between obesity and orofacial pain states, including TMJD. The relationship between obesity and TMJD has been tried to be expressed on different theories such as depression, changes in eating habits, and chronic inflammation in the previous literature but this is still unclear.,,, Wright et al. in their study of the distribution of various orofacial pain types found that TMJ and muscle pains were not significantly higher in individuals with overweight and obesity than normal-weight individuals. However, LeResche et al. argued that obesity may cause TMJD by increasing the inflammatory mechanism in the body.
One of the most commonly used methods for the detection of obesity is the measurement of BMI., Individuals' weight status was evaluated by using BMI in the current study and there was no statistically significant difference between BMI and TMJD frequency. While this result was reported by Wright et al., De Santis et al. found that the frequency of TMJD increased with decreasing BMI values in the pediatric population.
There are different methods and indexes used in the literature for the detection of TMJD. Fonseca anamnestic index (FAI) was used in the current study. Some previous studies have also used FAI. This questionnaire is easy to use and has been used for high sensitivity in identifying TMJD., Berni et al. showed that the FAI can be employed for the identification of myogenous TMJD in female cases. Pires et al. have shown that the short-form Fonseca anamnestic index can be used in the diagnosis of myogenous TMJD.
The current study has several limitations. First, similar to other studies in the literature, this is a cross-sectional study, so the cause-effect relationship between obesity and TMJD has not been clearly revealed. However, as previously reported in the literature, incorrect interpretation and diagnosis in cross-sectional studies are known to be fairly evenly distributed, therefore, the results are still significant. Another limitation of this study is the absence of such a study conducted in the. population, according to our knowledge. With the extension of this study with a wider number of individuals with additional parameters, a general idea can be obtained.
| Conclusion|| |
The prevalence of TMJD in individuals with obesity was not statistically different compared to individuals in normal weight and no difference was found between genders in the current study. However, in future with prospective studies, more comprehensive results will be obtained by increasing the number of individuals included in the study and by adding various parameters.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Augusto VG, Perina KC, Penha DS, Dos Santos DC, Oliveira VA. Temporomandibular dysfunction, stress and common mental disorder in university students. Acta Ortop Bras 2016;24:330-3.
Akhter R, Morita M, Ekuni D, Hassan NM, Furuta M, Yamanaka R, et al.
Self-reported aural symptoms, headache and temporomandibular disorders in Japanese young adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013;14:58.
LeResche L, Mancl LA, Drangsholt MT, Huang G, Von Korff M. Predictors of onset of facial pain and temporomandibular disorders in early adolescence. Pain 2007;129:269-78.
Carlsson GE. Epidemiology and treatment need for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:232-7.
Rutkiewicz T, Kononen M, Suominen-Taipale L, Nordblad A, Alanen P. Occurrence of clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders in adult Finns. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:208-17.
LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: Implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:291-305.
Lipton JA, Ship JA, Larach-Robinson D. Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:115-21.
Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:453-62.
Peck CC, Murray GM, Gerzina TM. How does pain affect jaw muscle activity? The integrated pain adaptation model. Aust Dent J 2008;53:201-7.
Rammelsberg P, LeResche L, Dworkin S, Mancl L. Longitudinal outcome of temporomandibular disorders: A 5-year epidemiologic study of muscle disorders defined by research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:9-20.
Clark GT, Seligman DA, Solberg WK, Pullinger AG. Guidelines for the examination and diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomandib Disord 1989;3:7-14.
Maffeis C. Aetiology of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 2000;159 (Suppl 1):35-44.
Neeley WW 2nd
, Gonzales DA. Obesity in adolescence: Implications in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:581-8.
Fruhbeck G, Toplak H, Woodward E, Yumuk V, Maislos M, Oppert JM; Executive Committee of the European Association for the Study of O. Obesity: The gateway to ill health-An EASO position statement on a rising public health, clinical and scientific challenge in Europe. Obes Facts 2013;6:117-20.
Visscher TL, Seidell JC. The public health impact of obesity. Annu Rev Public Health 2001;22:355-75.
Murakami K, Sasaki S, Takahashi Y, Uenishi K, Yamasaki M, Hayabuchi H, et al.
Hardness (difficulty of chewing) of the habitual diet in relation to body mass index and waist circumference in free-living Japanese women aged 18-22 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:206-13.
Chaves PJ, de Oliveira FEM, Damazio LCM. Incidence of postural changes and temporomandibular disorders in students. Acta Ortop Bras 2017;25:162-4.
Roberts C, Troop N, Connan F, Treasure J, Campbell IC. The effects of stress on body weight: Biological and psychological predictors of change in BMI. Obesity [Silver Spring] 2007;15:3045-55.
Nguyen-Rodriguez ST, Chou CP, Unger JB, Spruijt-Metz D. BMI as a moderator of perceived stress and emotional eating in adolescents. Eat Behav 2008;9:238-46.
Fonseca DM, Bonfate G, Valle AL. Diagnóstico pela anamnese da disfunção craniomandibular. Rev Gaúcha Odontol 1994;42:23-8.
Wright LJ, Schur E, Noonan C, Ahumada S, Buchwald D, Afari N. Chronic pain, overweight, and obesity: Findings from a community-based twin registry. J Pain 2010;11:628-35.
Badel T, Simunković SK, Marotti M, Lovko SK, Kern J, Krolo I. Study of temporomandibular joint disorder in older patients by magnetic resonance imaging. Gerodontology 2012;29:735-41
Rhim E, Han K, Yun KI. Association between temporomandibular disorders and obesity. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016;44:1003-7.
Jordani PC, Campi LB, Circeli GZ, Visscher CM, Bigal ME, Goncalves DA. Obesity as a risk factor for temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:1-8.
Bigal ME, Liberman JN, Lipton RB. Obesity and migraine: A population study. Neurology 2006;66:545-50.
Ohrbach R, Fillingim RB, Mulkey F, Gonzalez Y, Gordon S, Gremillion H, et al.
Clinical findings and pain symptoms as potential risk factors for chronic TMD: Descriptive data and empirically identified domains from the OPPERA case-control study. J Pain 2011;12:27-45.
De Santis TO, Martins MD, Motta LJ, Amancio OM, Fernandes KP, Bussadori SK. Association between temporomandibular disorder and body mass index in institutionalized children. Braz J Oral Sci 2010;9:459-63.
Bevilaqua-Grossi D, Chaves TC, de Oliveira AS, Monteiro-Pedro V. Anamnestic index severity and signs and symptoms of TMD. Cranio 2006;24:112-8.
Berni KC, Dibai-Filho AV, Rodrigues-Bigaton D. Accuracy of the Fonseca anamnestic index in the identification of myogenous temporomandibular disorder in female community cases. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2015;19:404-9.
Pires PF, de Castro EM, Pelai EB, de Arruda AB, Rodrigues-Bigaton D. Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of the Short-Form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder in women. Braz J Phys Ther 2018;22:276-82.
Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1st
edit. London (UK): Chapman and Hall; 1991.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]