Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 246   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 1010-1019

Classification of alveolar bone destruction patterns on maxillary molars by using cone-beam computed tomography


Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
G Ozcan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.180074

Rights and Permissions

Objective: The defective diagnosis of alveolar structures is one of most serious handicaps when assessing available periodontal treatment options for the prevention of tooth loss. The aim of this research was to classify alveolar bone defects in the maxillary molar region which is a challenging area for dental implant applications. To our knowledge, this is the first study of periodontal bone defect prevalence by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: In this study, the remaining alveolar bone patterns of 669 maxillary molars of 243 patients with periodontal bone loss were investigated on four aspects and the furcation areas of teeth, and then they were classified into six main groups. Combined periodontal-endodontic lesions (CPELs) were also reported in another category. Results: Following exclusion of 39 (5.8%) teeth with CPEL, the most common group was horizontal bone defects (71.4%) and the least seen group was three-walled vertical bone defects (1.9%) in all alveolar bone sides of teeth. Osseous crater was found at the rate of 6.7% on interdental alveolar bone. Dehiscence and fenestration were detected at rates of 2.7% and 3.3%, respectively. In the assessment of furcation areas, there was no furcation involvement in 61.4% of all teeth and the rate of Grade-II involvements was 26.2%. Conclusions: The most appropriate treatment option may be decided through accurate imaging of periodontal defect morphology. CBCT can provide comprehensive information about the remaining alveolar bone structures. In this way, the need for dental implant can be prevented in many cases and be replaced with a more conservative approach on the maxillary molar region.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7723    
    Printed158    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded816    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal