Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 17   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 

  Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 788-794

Effects of auditory and audiovisual presentations on anxiety and behavioral changes in children undergoing elective surgery


Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey

Date of Acceptance22-Nov-2017
Date of Web Publication11-Jun-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Z Hatipoglu
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana 01260
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_227_17

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Preoperative anxiety is a critical issue in children, and associated with postoperative behavioral changes. Aims: The purpose of the current study is to evaluate how audiovisual and auditory presentations about the perioperative period impact preoperative anxiety and postoperative behavioral disturbances of children undergoing elective ambulatory surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 99 patients between the ages of 5–12, scheduled to undergo outpatient surgery, participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups; audiovisual group (Group V, n = 33), auditory group (Group A, n = 33), and control group (Group C, n = 33). During the evaluation, the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (M-YPAS) and the posthospitalization behavioral questionnaire (PHBQ) were used. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. M-YPAS scores were significantly lower in Group V than in Groups C and A (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). PHBQ scores in Group C were statistically higher than in Groups A and V, but, no statistical difference was found between Groups A and V. Conclusion: Compared to auditory presentations, audiovisual presentations, in terms of being memorable and interesting, may be more effective in reducing children's anxiety. In addition, we can suggest that both methods can be equally effective for postoperative behavioral changes.

Keywords: Anxiety, audiovisual aids, behavioral rating scale, child behavior


How to cite this article:
Hatipoglu Z, Gulec E, Lafli D, Ozcengiz D. Effects of auditory and audiovisual presentations on anxiety and behavioral changes in children undergoing elective surgery. Niger J Clin Pract 2018;21:788-94

How to cite this URL:
Hatipoglu Z, Gulec E, Lafli D, Ozcengiz D. Effects of auditory and audiovisual presentations on anxiety and behavioral changes in children undergoing elective surgery. Niger J Clin Pract [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Jul 27];21:788-94. Available from: https://www.njcponline.com/text.asp?2018/21/6/788/234039




   Introduction Top


Hospitalization and surgery are a serious and memorable event for children and their parents. Children undergoing surgery and their parents can be anxious in the preoperative period, and it occurs up to 65% of children.[1] Preoperative anxiety is associated with postoperative pain, emergence delirium, and postoperative behavioral changes (e.g., general anxiety, appetite changes, sleep disturbances, enuresis, and temper tantrums).[2],[3],[4]

Pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods are utilized to treat preoperative anxiety in children. In the recent years, nonpharmacological methods are preferred due to possible adverse effects (e.g., excessive sedation and delayed discharge) of pharmacological methods.[5] Nonpharmacological methods are as follows: the presence of parents, distraction techniques, fun transportation systems, preoperative information programs, hypnosis, music, and acupuncture.[2]

Behavioral interventions that are used as preoperative preparation programs are applied through coping skills, modeling, and play therapy.[2] The aim of behavioral programs is to teach coping skills through modeling for anxiety to children and also to provide information about the perioperative process. These interventions should be prepared taking into consideration a child's age, developmental stage, and previous experience.[2],[6]

There are three methods which are known to be effective in learning; i.e., visual (pictures, images, demonstrations), auditory (reading, words, listening), and kinesthetic (touch, taste). Visual images are important to visual learning, in which body language is also used. It is also important to be informed by listening to auditory learning.[7] Most people learn best using a combination of both, although visual learning is usually the prominent component.[8] To the best of our knowledge, an auditory-related (listening) study outside of music therapy is not available for preoperative anxiety management while there are limited audiovisual studies involving children in the literature.[9],[10],[11]

The current study was designed to compare the effects of audiovisual and auditory presentations on preoperative anxiety and postoperative behavioral disturbances of children undergoing elective ambulatory surgery. The primary end point was the preoperative anxiety levels of patients. The secondary end point was the behavioral changes of children in the postoperative period.


   Materials and Methods Top


Patients

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Cukurova University, Faculty of Medicine (no: 45/2015). We enrolled patients between March 2015 and February 2016. Written informed consent was obtained from all the parents. Ninety-nine patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical Status I-II, aged 5–12 years old and scheduled for outpatient surgery (e.g., orchiopexy, hypospadias surgery, inguinal hernia, tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, and strabismus surgery) were accepted in the present study. Children with chronic illness, undergoing emergency surgery, cognitive disorders, and parents who refuse to participate were excluded from this study.

Study design

The study participants were allocated to the groups using a computer-generated randomization list at preoperative visit: audiovisual group (Group V, n = 33), auditory group (Group A, n = 33), and the standard of care group (Group C, n = 33).

After all patients were examined by an anesthesiologist at hospital admission 1 week before surgery, the following applications were presented: the patients in Group V were shown an audiovisual presentation to inform about preoperative preparation and postoperative period [Appendix 1]. The sound recording of this video was listened to by the patients in Group A without the visual element of the audiovisual presentation. The patients in Group C were verbally informed on usual the anesthesia practice of our hospital (e.g., anesthesia and analgesia management, preoperative fasting, and regular use of the drug to be administered after surgery). Parents accompanied their children during this time. Patient's age, gender, history of previous surgery, type of surgery, and parent's age, gender, and educational level were recorded.

Measurements

The children in all groups were admitted with one of the parents into the preoperative holding room. The preoperative anxiety levels of children were measured with the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (M-YPAS) at induction of anesthesia after being taken into the operating room. This assessment was made by an anesthesiologist who was blinded to the groups. In brief, the M-YPAS is used to measure children's anxiety in the preoperative holding area and during induction of anesthesia. The M-YPAS contains 22 items in five categories (activity, emotional expressivity, state of arousal, vocalization, and use of parents). The scoring in each category is done with a different number of items (either four or six). A total adjusted score is calculated with a formula after evaluating partial weight ([activity/4+ emotional expressivity/4+ state of arousal/4+ use of parents/4+ vocalization/6] ×100/5). The cutoff point of 30 on the M-YPAS leads to balance in which the sensitivity and specificity are high, and the predictive value is 79%.[12]

Postoperative maladaptive behaviors of children were assessed using the posthospitalization behavioral questionnaire (PHBQ). Parents were contacted by telephone 7 days after hospital discharge, and this assessment was performed by the same anesthesiologist. In brief, the PHBQ contains a total of 27 items in the following six subscales: general anxiety and regression, separation anxiety, eating disturbance, aggression toward authority, apathy/withdrawal, and anxiety about sleep. The PHBQ is scored by parents using five response options: much less than before (1), less than before (2), same as before (3), more than before (4), and much more than before.[13] Psychometric properties of the PHBQ have been shown in a study of Vernon et al.[14] We considered the negative behavioral change as a response of 4 or 5 for an item of the PHBQ.[15]

Anesthesia management

After 6 h of fasting, the children were taken into a preoperative holding area and none of the children used any premedication. The children were taken accompanied by their parents into the operating room from the preoperative holding area. Standard monitoring was applied to patients (electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter, and noninvasive blood pressure). Anesthesia induction was provided with 6%–8% sevoflurane and a gas mixture of (40%–60%) oxygen/nitrous oxide. After placing intravenous (IV) cannula on the hand, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered and all patients were intubated. Fluid resuscitation was accomplished with Ringer's lactate solution (3–5 ml/kg/h). After anesthesia induction, the parents were taken out of the operating room with a nurse. Maintenance of anesthesia was provided with 1%–2% sevoflurane and a gas mixture of (40%–60%) oxygen/nitrous oxide. For intraoperative analgesia, fentanyl 1 μg/kg was given. Tramadol (2 mg/kg, IV) was administered for postoperative analgesia in all patients. After the end of the surgery, anesthesia was terminated, and the neuromuscular blockade was antagonized with atropine (0.015 mg/kg, IV) and neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg, IV). The awakened patients were transferred to the recovery room accompanied by their parents. After recovery, the children were transported to their clinical wards.

Statistical analysis

Sample size analysis was performed using G*Power version 3.1.9.2 (G*Power Software, Kiel, Germany). We calculated the sample size with a power of 0.80 and an α of 0.05 as 24 patients for each group to detect 10 points difference in M-YPAS scores between the groups. A control mean M-YPAS score of 50 with an SD of 12 was reported in a previous study.[16] All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software package (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages, whereas continuous variables were summarized as a mean and standard deviation and as median and range where appropriate. The normality of distribution for continuous variables was confirmed with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. For comparison of continuous variables between two groups, the Student's t-test was used. For comparison of three groups, the One-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test was used depending on whether the statistical hypotheses were fulfilled or not. For normally distributed data, regarding the homogeneity of variances, Bonferroni, Scheffe, Tamhane tests were used for multiple comparisons of groups. For abnormally distributed data, a Bonferroni adjusted Mann–Whitney U-test was used for multiple comparisons of groups. To evaluate the correlations between measurements, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of postoperative maladaptive behaviors. According to the “cutoff points,” patients were divided into two subgroups; a calm group that included patients who scored <30th percentile of the M-YPAS and an anxious group that included patients who scored >30th percentile of the M-YPAS.[12] The statistical level of significance for all tests was considered to be 0.05.


   Results Top


Flow diagram for the study is shown in [Figure 1]. The demographic characteristics of patients and parents were similar between the three groups [Table 1]. No significant differences were found in terms of surgical data between the three groups [Table 2].
Figure 1: Flow diagram of the study

Click here to view
Table 1: Patients and parents’ demographic data

Click here to view
Table 2: Surgical data

Click here to view


The M-YPAS scores were significantly lower in Group V than Groups C and A (P< 0.001) [Table 3]. When comparing the three groups, there were no statistically relationships among age, previous surgery, type of surgery, the education level, and gender of parents on the M-YPAS scores. However, on the basis of the evaluation of all patients, preschool children (<7 years old) had more anxiety (43.0 ± 23.3 vs. 52.3 ± 26.6, P = 0.071). Similarly, the M-YPAS scores of 37 children who underwent a previous surgery were compared with 62 nonoperated children, nonoperated children had lower M-YPAS scores (42.2 ± 23.9 vs. 54.0 ± 25.1, P = 0.022).
Table 3: The means of the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale and Posthospitalization Behavioral Questionnaire

Click here to view


The patients in Group C had statistically higher PHBQ scores than those in Groups A and V (P< 0.001) [Table 3]. For all patients, no correlation was found between PHBQ and children's age, whereas there was a correlation between PHBQ and parent gender (P = 0.01). In addition, anxious child (<30th percentile) had 1.03 times greater risk of adopting negative behaviors than a calm child (>30th percentile) [Table 4]. Especially, in anxious children, there was a significant correlation between M-YPAS and general anxiety, separation anxiety, apathy, and sleep disturbances (P< 0.05), and the number of new postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes is summarized [Table 5].
Table 4: Predictors for postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes

Click here to view
Table 5: New postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The results of the present study showed that audiovisual presentation related to preanesthetic information in children is an effective approach in reducing preoperative anxiety. Furthermore, children who were informed with audiovisual and audio presentation had less behavioral changes 1 week after discharge.

In the literature, there are some trials that used audiovisual presentations for providing information to patients.[17],[18],[19] Gaskey showed that the addition of audiovisual presentation to the routine preoperative anesthesia visit did not produce a significant reduction in preoperative anxiety levels in adult patients. However, patients were less nervous and had higher levels of knowledge about anesthesia procedures.[18] In contrast, the study findings demonstrated exposure to an audiovisual presentation significantly reduced anxiety at anesthesia induction. In this regard, Kain et al. stated that behavioral preparation program (ADVANCE: Anxiety-reduction, Distraction, Video modeling, Adding parents, No excessive reassurance, coaching, and exposure/shaping) is efficient in the reduction of children's anxiety.[20] Similarly, Web-Based Tailored Intervention for Preparation of Parents and Children for Outpatient Surgery (WebTIPS) is a web-based preoperative preparation program with features, including information provision, modeling, and coping skills. The study showed that WebTIPS reduces the anxiety of children in the preoperative settings.[21] Although both studies are comprehensive programs and effective on preoperative anxiety, the cost of these programs is quite expensive. In another study, Batuman et al. concluded that informational videos about preoperative preparation help to decrease children's preoperative anxiety.[22] Unlike our study, they evaluated the effects on the preoperative anxiety of only audiovisual presentation. The result of these studies shows that an audiovisual presentation about preoperative information produces improved outcomes on children's anxiety, and it is considered a low-cost method.

A systematic review reported that music therapy might be an ineffective method for coping with anxiety, and an audiovisual presentation is more effective than music therapy in reducing preoperative anxiety in children.[9] Similar to the findings in our study, preoperative information video has a stronger impact on children's anxiety than an auditory presentation. Although both methods include the same information, an audiovisual presentation may be more memorable and interesting to children. Since children have broad imaginations, the mental visualization in an auditory presentation will be unique for each child. This may cause them to misperceive the given information from auditory methods in unfavorable ways and become afraid of the upcoming surgery.

In this study, there is no relationship between the children's age and M-YPAS. This is consistent with the study by Vagnoli et al.[23] Although there was no statistical difference, children under the age of 7 years were more anxious. Surgery creates a greater emotional stress in younger children due to poorer comprehension increased dependency on the mother, less communication with the social environment, and decreased the ability to manage anxiety.[24] The study also shows that children without any previous operations had less anxiety. This should be noted as preoperative information programs may adversely affect the emotional status in previously hospitalized children.[6]

Risk factors for negative postoperative behavior changes have been reported to include the following; preoperative anxiety, younger age, previous anesthesia experiences, premedication, and increased parental anxiety.[1],[4] In this study, the children who received a standard information had more PHBQ scores. Similarly, Hilly et al. indicated that workshops for preoperative preparation decrease both preoperative anxiety levels and postoperative behavioral changes in children.[3] Regardless of the format of presentation, we demonstrated a positive effect on behavioral changes in children in the postoperative period. In addition, we found that there is an association between preoperative anxiety and postoperative maladaptive behaviors such as separation anxiety, general anxiety, apathy, and sleep disturbances, which is consistent with the results of previous studies.[1] This study also shows that maternal presence may prevent the development of postoperative negative behavioral changes, regardless of other personal information of the parents. This situation can be explained by the emotional bond between mother and child.[25],[26]

The present study has a number of limitations. First, the anxiety levels of parents were not evaluated. Parental anxiety has an effect on the child in the preoperative period.[2] McEwen et al. have reported that preoperative information videos can lessen the anxiety of parents.[27] Cassady et al. also agree with this study, but Chundamala et al. presented a different viewpoint that parental presence does not reduce the parents' or the children's anxiety.[28],[29] Considering these results, we cannot eliminate the effect of parental anxiety on children. Second, the relationship between pain and behavioral changes is a controversial issue.[4],[30] Pain may have a negative effect on a child's behavior; however, we did not evaluate the children's pain scores as an indicator of postoperative behavioral changes. Thus, we recommend the evaluation of pain in future studies. Third, M-YPAS was measured only at the point of anesthesia induction. We do not know anxiety levels of the children in the preoperative waiting room or at hospital admission. Finally, there was no validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the M-YPAS and PHBQ.


   Conclusion Top


Audiovisual presentation is an effective and inexpensive method to preoperative anxiety reduction in children. It is a more memorable and interesting approach compared to auditory presentations for children. Both audiovisual and auditory presentations have equal effects on postoperative behavioral changes.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ilker UNAL (PhD, from Cukurova University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics) for the statistical analysis of this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


   Appendices Top


Appendix 1: The content of the audiovisual presentation

The total duration of the video recording was 344 s and it consisted of two sections: Part 1 and 2. Doctors, nurses, an 11-year-old female, and her mother took part in the video and special permission was received from them to be recorded. The audiovisual presentation was recorded in the anesthesia clinic and operating room of our hospital.

Part 1: This section is 300 s long and includes the verbal explanation by the anesthesiologist of preoperative information, anesthesia management, and the postoperative period. Three people were involved in this section: the anesthesiologist, the child, and her mother. The teddy bear was used as model. The child and her mother visit the anesthesiologist for preoperative information in the anesthesia clinic. The anesthesiologist meets with them and then informs them about the surgery and the anesthesia methods. First, the child asks “What is surgery?” and then she mentions “I am afraid of the pain.” The doctor explains that “You will not be in any pain” and continues by saying, “The duties of the anesthesiologist are to apply anesthesia to patients, to reduce their pain and ensure their well-being during operation.” After the child relaxes, the anesthesiologist describes how anesthesia is administered by two methods. The first method is to insert a small plastic tube into a vessel on the hand and some anesthetic drugs are administered via the small tube. The anesthesiologist uses a teddy bear for the second method. The doctor explains “This is a face mask and it smells nice.” She puts a small face mask on the face of the teddy bear and says, “It is connected to the anesthesia machine by a plastic tube. Anesthetic gases are given through the plastic tube.” The doctor pretends to tell the teddy bear to take deep breaths and says, “This will help you fall asleep quickly and after that the surgery will be performed. At the end of surgery, you will be awakened by the administering of some drugs. Furthermore, I will administer drugs for pain relief.” After explaining anesthesia, the doctor says to the child’s mother “Your child will be safe and you should not feel restlessness related to the surgery or anesthesia.” The anesthesiologist explains that preoperative fasting is six hours and postoperative drugs are given regularly. They leave and plan to meet again the next day for the operation.

Part 2: This section is 44 s long and contains preoperative preparation, anesthesia induction, and a recovery period. The child and mother come into the operating room with the personnel. The nurse meets them in the preoperative holding area. The anesthesiologist comes into the preoperative holding area and takes the child and mother into the operating room. The doctor inserts a device in the child’s finger and explains that “The device measures the amount of oxygen in the blood.” The doctor performs anesthesia with the face mask and says, “Take deep breaths and have a good sleep.” After completing the operation, the doctor wakes the child and takes her into the recovery room. The anesthesiologist talks with the child and mother and leaves from the recovery room.



 
   References Top

1.
Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I, McClain B, Gaal D, Mayes LC, et al. Preoperative anxiety and emergence delirium and postoperative maladaptive behaviors. Anesth Analg 2004;99:1648-54.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Ahmed MI, Farrell MA, Parrish K, Karla A. Preoperative anxiety in children risk factors and non-pharmacological management. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2011;21:153-64.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Hilly J, Hörlin AL, Kinderf J, Ghez C, Menrath S, Delivet H, et al. Preoperative preparation workshop reduces postoperative maladaptive behavior in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2015;25:990-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Stargatt R, Davidson AJ, Huang GH, Czarnecki C, Gibson MA, Stewart SA, et al. Acohort study of the incidence and risk factors for negative behavior changes in children after general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2006;16:846-59.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Manyande A, Cyna AM, Yip P, Chooi C, Middleton P. Non-pharmacological interventions for assisting the induction of anaesthesia in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;14:CD006447.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caramico LA. Preoperative preparation in children: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Anesth 1996;8:508-14.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Gilakjani AP. Visual, auditory, kinesthetic learning styles and their impacts on English language teaching. J Stud Educ 2011;2:104-13.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Felder RM, Soloman BA. Learning Styles and Strategies. Available from: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/styles.htm  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chow CH, Van Lieshout RJ, Schmidt LA, Dobson KG, Buckley N. Systematic review: Audiovisual interventions for reducing preoperative anxiety in children undergoing elective surgery. J Pediatr Psychol 2016;41:182-203.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Bradt J, Dileo C, Shim M. Music interventions for preoperative anxiety. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;6:CD006908.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Millett CR. The Effect of Music Therapy Interaction on Child and Parental Preoperative Anxiety in Parents of Children Undergoing Day. Theses and Dissertations-Music. Student, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA; 2015. p. 42.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Cicchetti DV, Bagnall AL, Finley JD, Hofstadter MB, et al. The Yale preoperative anxiety scale: How does it compare with a “gold standard”? Anesth Analg 1997;85:783-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Jenkins BN, Kain ZN, Kaplan SH, Stevenson RS, Mayes LC, Guadarrama J, et al. Revisiting a measure of child postoperative recovery: Development of the post hospitalization behavior questionnaire for ambulatory surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 2015;25:738-45.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Vernon DT, Schulman JL, Foley JM. Changes in children's behavior after hospitalization. Some dimensions of response and their correlates. Am J Dis Child 1966;111:581-93.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Faulk DJ, Twite MD, Zuk J, Pan Z, Wallen B, Friesen R. Hypnotic depth and the incidence of emergence agitation and negative postoperative behavioral changes. Paediatr Anaesth 2010;20:72-81.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Krivutza DM, Weinberg ME, Gaal D, Wang SM, et al. Interactive music therapy as a treatment for preoperative anxiety in children: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1260-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Rice M, Glasper A, Keeton D, Spargo P. The effect of a preoperative education programme on perioperative anxiety in children: an observational study. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18:426-30.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Gaskey NJ. Evaluation of the effect of a preoperative anesthesia videotape. AANAJ 1987;55:341-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cumino DO, Vieira JE, Lima LC, Stievano LP, Silva RA, Mathias LA. Smartphone-based behavioural intervention alleviates children's anxiety during anaesthesia induction: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017;34:169-75.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.
Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Mayes LC, Weinberg ME, Wang SM, MacLaren JE, et al. Family-centered preparation for surgery improves perioperative outcomes in children a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2007;106:65-74.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Fortier MA, Bunzli E, Walthall J, Olshansky E, Saadat H, Santistevan R, et al. Web-based tailored intervention for preparation of parents and children for outpatient surgery (WebTIPS): Formative evaluation and randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2015;120:915.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.
Batuman A, Gulec E, Turktan M, Gunes Y, Ozcengiz D. Preoperative informational video based on model making reduces preoperative anxiety and postoperative negative behavioral changes in children. Minerva Anestesiol 2016;82:534-42.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.
Vagnoli L, Caprilli S, Robiglio A, Messeri A. Clown doctors as a treatment for preoperative anxiety in children: a randomized, prospective study. Pediatrics 2005;116:563-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
McGraw T. Preparing children for the operating room: Psychological issues. Can J Anaesth 1994;41:1094-03.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.
Messeri A, Caprilli S, Busoni P. Anaesthesia induction in children: a psychological evaluation of the efficiency of parents' presence. Paediatr Anaesth 2004;14:551-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Rancourt KM, Chorney JM, Kain Z. Children's immediate postoperative distress and mothers' and fathers' touch behaviors. J Pediatr Psychol 2015;40:1115-23.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.
Mc Ewen A, Moorthy C, Quantock C, Rose H, Kavanagh R. The effect of videotaped preoperative information on parental anxiety during anesthesia induction for elective pediatric procedures. Paediatr Anaesth 2007;17:534-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Cassady JF, Wysocki TT, Miller KM, Cancel DD, Izenberg N. Use of a preanesthetic video for facilitation of parental education and anxiolysis is before pediatric ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;88:246-50.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Chundamala J, Wright JG, Kemp SM. An evidence-based review of parental presence during anesthesia induction and parent/child anxiety. Can J Anaesth 2009;56:57-70.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]    
30.
Kotiniemi LH, Ryhänen PT, Moilanen IK. Behavioral changes in children following day-case surgery: A 4-week follow-up of 551 children. Anaesthesia 1997;52:970-6.  Back to cited text no. 30
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Effects of Educational Video on Pre-operative Anxiety in Children - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Valentina Härter,Claus Barkmann,Christian Wiessner,Martin Rupprecht,Konrad Reinshagen,Julian Trah
Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2021; 9
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Which is good for pre-operative anxiety? Midazolam, video games or teaching with cartoons
Bahar Sakizci Uyar,Reyhan Polat,Merve Bolat,Asli Donmez
European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2021; 38(7): 744
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Video Glasses Reduce Preoperative Anxiety Compared With Portable Multimedia Player in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Yuki Hashimoto,Tomohiro Chaki,Naoyuki Hirata,Yasuyuki Tokinaga,Yusuke Yoshikawa,Michiaki Yamakage
Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Pre-operative Anxiety in Pediatric Surgery Patients: Multiple Case Study Analysis with Literature Review
Emily Fronk,Stephen Bates Billick
Psychiatric Quarterly. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Effect of multimedia-based nursing visit on perioperative anxiety in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Jingjing Shao,Ting Xiao,Minxin Shi,Xiaomei Zhou,Zhiwei Wang,Tianlong Lin,Rongfang Xu,Hongxia Ni,Aihua Zhang
Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2019; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
   Appendices
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3773    
    Printed62    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded695    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal